Mill's Ethics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Mills Ethics - Essay ExampleShe knew, however, just then that it was all wrong for snick is a married man with two children and Mary is his wife of five years at that point in time. Now, since Chloe is a common link who happens to have witnessed scenarios on both sides and believes to have firsthand knowledge of the good conflict, she eventually finds herself in a dilemma of choosing which between the two parties ought to be dealt with first. By the established norm, of course, she must opt to stop Jane from proceeding to fall into an extramarital relationship with Nick for the sake of Marys family, being the mans original legal attachment. Nevertheless, in doing so, she would have caused Jane severe pain come on of an emotional struggle which she is known to be weak in coping especially when she seems to have put forth in reasoning that her current accede of affair was obtained with huge sacrifices that her happiness, as the chief consequence thereof, may not or should not be taken away from her at all cost. Apparently, Chloe figures the inclemency of Janes argument upon pondering on some relevant aspects of John Stuart Mills ethics on utilitarianism, yet reserves an equivalent degree of doubt and philosophical analysis in favor of Mary. By the simple defining principle of utilitarianism in which the consequence is set to determine the moral look upon of an action or deed, Stuart Mill emerges to draw on a favored unique perspective where such theory ought to be acknowledged in the neat of understanding that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness (Mill, Ch. 2). Equivalently, this is to typify that as long as an act or behavior causes one or many to be happy, then it is to be judged as morally right. adept way of gaining discernment of this proposition is by asking is happiness then a measure of justice? To what extent should happiness shape the view of moral philoso phy as good and scrupulous if there are people like Jane whose case is quite special? What if ones doings of something make the idiosyncratic happy yet the ones beyond his or her circle are rather annoyed or hurt as in the probable effect which Jane and Nicks immoral quest would bear upon Mary? Surely Jane deserves to be happy and possesses the right to act accordingly but how post actions by which happiness is experienced be evaluated as truly ethically conforming if someone else out there as Mary is otherwise bound to be suffering? Or must a specific area be defined within which only a certain set of actions with all the corresponding outcomes can be permitted to undergo moral justifications? At this stage, Chloe could be found to comprehend Jane on account of Mills claim that what promotes happiness at least for Janes part should be right but it would similarly suspend her judgment for Marys welfare since Janes consent of the illegal numerate advances not in any way the happi ness or interest of Mary. While their situation may be felt to require a great level of moral concern, Mills philosophy appears to consist of a pattern or direction where the kind of happiness being referred to equates to joy, and this pleasure comes in different forms, quality, and quantity. In this regard, the political economist seems to have chiefly adhered to pleasure